monkey: be funny

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54
, marmoset
Weight: 0.52
, lemur
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funny 1.00
be at silly book 0.82
be at joke 0.82
be at scary movie 0.81
be fun 0.79
be fun but big respondsibility 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be fun)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, be fun)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pet, be fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at scary movie)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pet, be fun)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at silly book)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(monkey, be funny)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be fun)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(monkey, be funny)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(monkey, be funny)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(monkey, be funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marmoset, be at silly book)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at silly book)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(monkey, be funny)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at joke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at joke)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(monkey, be at joke)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monkey, be at joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monkey, be funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, be fun)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(creature, be at scary movie)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at silly book)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, be fun)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(creature, be at scary movie)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(monkey, be funny)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)