montana: have low population

Property	Similarity
have low population	1.00
have population	0.93
have small population	0.91
have population state	0.91
have population big state	0.88

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(montana, have population)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(montana, have population)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(montana, have small population)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(montana, have population state)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(montana, have population state)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(montana, have population)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(montana, have population)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(montana, have population state)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(montana, have population state)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(montana, have small population)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(montana, have population big state)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(montana, have small population)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(montana, have small population)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(montana, have population big state)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(montana, have low population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(montana, have population big state)

Parents	place Weight: 0.58 , area Weight: 0.57 , state Weight: 0.54 , united states Weight: 0.53 , colorado Weight: 0.53
Siblings	south carolina Weight: 0.34 , wyoming Weight: 0.34 , delaware Weight: 0.34 , north carolina Weight: 0.34 , idaho Weight: 0.34

montana: have low population

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible