montana: have population big state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, united states
Weight: 0.53
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, delaware
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, idaho
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population big state 1.00
have population state 0.96
have small population 0.93
have population 0.93
have low population 0.88
has state state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(idaho, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(delaware, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(montana, have population big state)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(montana, have population state)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(montana, have population)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(montana, have population state)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(montana, have population state)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(montana, have population)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(montana, have population big state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(montana, have population big state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)