montreal: speak french

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
speak french 1.00
is french 0.91
be island of french 0.82
was appealing to french 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(quebec, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(montreal, speak french)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(quebec, is french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(montreal, speak french)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(quebec, speak french)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(quebec, is french)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(quebec, speak french)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(quebec, is french)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(quebec, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, speak french)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(quebec, is french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, speak french)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(montreal, speak french)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(montreal, is french)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(montreal, is french)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(montreal, is french)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is french)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(montreal, be island of french)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(montreal, be island of french)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(montreal, was appealing to french)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(montreal, speak french)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quebec, speak french)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(quebec, is french)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quebec, speak french)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(montreal, speak french) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(quebec, is french)