mood: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.64
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.60
Siblings anxiety
Weight: 0.66
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.35
, attitude
Weight: 0.34
, neurosis
Weight: 0.34
, feeling
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
is health concern 0.92
has state problem 0.84
is mental health concern 0.84
has state anxiety 0.81
has state dislike 0.78
have problem 0.78
has state challenge 0.77
is problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mood, has state concern)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mood, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has state challenge)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(anxiety, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(feeling, is problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(feeling, have problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mood, has state concern)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mood, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(anxiety, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(anxiety, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(feeling, have problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(feeling, is problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(feeling, is problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(feeling, has state challenge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(feeling, has state challenge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mood, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mood, is health concern)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mood, is health concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mood, is health concern)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mood, is mental health concern)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mood, is mental health concern)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mood, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(feeling, have problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(anxiety, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(feeling, is problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(feeling, has state challenge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mood, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)