motherboard: be important for computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
, card
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gigabyte
Weight: 0.48
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.38
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, laptop
Weight: 0.37
, router
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for computer 1.00
be most complicated component in computers 0.84
cost more than desktop computers 0.82
be recognized on computer networks 0.81
giving input to computer 0.81
be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power 0.80
produce images on computer 0.80
be called laptop 0.79
be called laptops 0.77
be more expensive than desktop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, giving input to computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(card, giving input to computer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(card, giving input to computer)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be more expensive than desktop)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be called laptops)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be called laptop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, giving input to computer)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(laptop, be called laptop)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(laptop, be called laptop)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(laptop, be called laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(laptop, be called laptops)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(laptop, be more expensive than desktop)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(laptop, be more expensive than desktop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(motherboard, be important for computer)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(motherboard, be most complicated component in computers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(motherboard, be most complicated component in computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(motherboard, produce images on computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(motherboard, be most complicated component in computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(motherboard, produce images on computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(motherboard, produce images on computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, produce images on computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be most complicated component in computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(card, giving input to computer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(laptop, be called laptop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(laptop, be called laptops)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(laptop, be more expensive than desktop)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(card, giving input to computer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(motherboard, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)