motor: be flush bad on turbo engines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
Siblings electric motor
Weight: 0.70
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.60
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.35
, automobile
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be flush bad on turbo engines 1.00
be more efficient than combustion engines 0.82
be rated in horsepower 0.76
lose torque 0.76
have instant torque 0.75
have more torque 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, lose torque)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, have more torque)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, have more torque)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, have instant torque)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(electric motor, have instant torque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electric motor, have instant torque)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(electric motor, lose torque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(electric motor, lose torque)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(electric motor, have more torque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric motor, have more torque)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(diesel engine, have more torque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, have more torque)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(motor, lose torque)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(motor, be rated in horsepower)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(motor, lose torque)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(motor, have instant torque)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(motor, have instant torque)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(motor, be rated in horsepower)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(motor, have more torque)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(motor, have more torque)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(motor, lose torque)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(motor, have instant torque)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(motor, be rated in horsepower)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(motor, have more torque)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(motor, lose torque)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(motor, be rated in horsepower)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(motor, have more torque)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(motor, have instant torque)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(electric motor, have instant torque)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(electric motor, lose torque)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric motor, have more torque)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motor, be flush bad on turbo engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diesel engine, have more torque)