motor: have laminations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
Siblings electric motor
Weight: 0.70
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.60
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.35
, automobile
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have laminations 1.00
use laminations 0.99
have capacitors 0.77
use capacitors 0.77
be made of simple coils of wire 0.76
need run capacitors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, have capacitors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(electric motor, have capacitors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(electric motor, have capacitors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(motor, have laminations)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(motor, use laminations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(motor, use laminations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(motor, use laminations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(motor, use laminations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(motor, use capacitors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(motor, have capacitors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(motor, need run capacitors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(motor, be made of simple coils of wire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(motor, use capacitors)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(motor, be made of simple coils of wire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(motor, be made of simple coils of wire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(motor, use capacitors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(motor, be made of simple coils of wire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(motor, need run capacitors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(motor, have capacitors)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(motor, need run capacitors)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(motor, have capacitors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(motor, use capacitors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(motor, need run capacitors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(motor, have capacitors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(motor, have laminations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(motor, have laminations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(motor, have laminations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electric motor, have capacitors)