motorcycle: be fair market value determined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.73
, vehicle
Weight: 0.66
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.62
, ride
Weight: 0.62
, motor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings honda
Weight: 0.69
, hot rod
Weight: 0.57
, tractor
Weight: 0.56
, atv
Weight: 0.51
, scooter
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fair market value determined 1.00
is value 0.84
value 0.84
hold value 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tractor, is value)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tractor, value)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(honda, hold value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(honda, hold value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(honda, hold value)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tractor, value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tractor, value)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tractor, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tractor, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(motorcycle, be fair market value determined)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be fair market value determined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tractor, is value)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(honda, hold value)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be fair market value determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tractor, value)