mountain dew: be bad for teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.69
, drink
Weight: 0.66
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, soda
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.34
, coca cola
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33
, alpine
Weight: 0.33
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for teeth 1.00
be bad for guys 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for teeth)