mountain dew: be bad for guys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.69
, drink
Weight: 0.66
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, soda
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.34
, coca cola
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33
, alpine
Weight: 0.33
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for guys 1.00
be bad for males 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
be basically similar 0.76
be bad for teeth 0.76
be good at at arby 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for males)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for males)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be bad for males)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for males)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mountain dew, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be good at at arby)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be basically similar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be good at at arby)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be good at at arby)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be basically similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be basically similar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mountain dew, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be good at at arby)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be basically similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mountain dew, be bad for guys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)