mouse: be at cat mouth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cat mouth 1.00
be at dog mouth 0.95
be at my dog mouth 0.92
be at snake mouth 0.90
be at cat 0.88
be at my pet cat stomach 0.87
be at cat stomach 0.86
be at cat belly 0.85
be at cat jaw 0.85
be at cat box 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at cat box)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cat, be at cat box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cat, be at cat box)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mouse, be at cat mouth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mouse, be at cat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mouse, be at cat stomach)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat stomach)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mouse, be at cat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at cat stomach)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mouse, be at cat stomach)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at cat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mouse, be at cat mouth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cat, be at cat box)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at cat mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)