lizard: be at cat mouth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.80
, reptile
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.68
, toad
Weight: 0.63
, chameleon
Weight: 0.60
, gecko
Weight: 0.59
, skink
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cat mouth 1.00
be used to pet 0.78
be pet 0.78
be at another lizard belly 0.77
be keep as pet 0.77
be use as pet 0.77
be at pet store 0.77
be at pet shop 0.77
be at lizard cage 0.76
has leg snake do not 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(iguana, be pet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(iguana, be pet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(iguana, be pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lizard, be at lizard cage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at pet store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lizard, has leg snake do not)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lizard, be at another lizard belly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has leg snake do not)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at another lizard belly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lizard, has leg snake do not)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lizard, be at pet store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lizard, has leg snake do not)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lizard, be at pet store)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at pet store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at lizard cage)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lizard, be at another lizard belly)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at another lizard belly)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at lizard cage)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lizard, be at lizard cage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(iguana, be pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lizard, be at cat mouth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)