mouse: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be at store 0.88
be at computer store 0.80
be at grocery store 0.80
be at pet store 0.76
be at pet store home 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at pet store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at pet store)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at pet store home)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cat, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cat, be at pet store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cat, be at pet store home)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cat, be at pet store home)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lizard, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at pet store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mouse, be at department store)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mouse, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cat, be at pet store home)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cat, be at pet store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lizard, be at pet store)