mouse: be at in hole in grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in hole in grind 1.00
be at hole in grind 1.00
be at small hole in grind 0.97
be at hole 0.89
live in hole 0.88
be at grind 0.87
be at small hole 0.86
life on grind 0.83
be at rat hole 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mouse, be at in hole in grind)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mouse, be at hole)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mouse, be at small hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at hole)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mouse, be at hole)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lizard, be at hole)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)