mouse: be at small hole

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at small hole 1.00
be at hole 0.94
be at small hole in grind 0.92
live in hole 0.90
be at in hole in grind 0.86
be at hole in grind 0.86
be at rat hole 0.83
be small 0.80
be at very small space between your wall 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouse, be at small hole)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mouse, be at small hole)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mouse, be at hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mouse, be small)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at hole)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at in hole in grind)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mouse, be at hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mouse, be small)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be small)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mouse, be small)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouse, be at small hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lizard, be at hole)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mouse, be at small hole)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)