mri machine: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.63
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.38
, machine
Weight: 0.37
, time machine
Weight: 0.37
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fax machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fax machine, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sewing machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mri machine, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sewing machine, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fax machine, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)