mri: be than ct scanning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than ct scanning 1.00
ct scan 0.93
be better than ct 0.85
is ct 0.85
more is expensive than ct 0.85
scan 0.79
scan work 0.78
scans much cost 0.77
scans work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, scans work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mri, ct scan)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mri, is ct)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mri, ct scan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mri, scan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mri, ct scan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mri, is ct)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mri, be better than ct)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mri, scan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mri, be better than ct)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mri, scan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mri, be better than ct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mri, is ct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mri, scan work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mri, be better than ct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans much cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mri, scans work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mri, ct scan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mri, scan work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mri, is ct)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mri, scans much cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mri, scans work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, scan work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mri, scans much cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mri, scans much cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mri, scans work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ultrasound, scans work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mri, be than ct scanning)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)