mri: scan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
scan 1.00
scan work 0.98
scans work 0.93
ct scan 0.87
scans much cost 0.87
scan for prostate cancer 0.82
be than ct scanning 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mri, scan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mri, scan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, scans work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mri, scan)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan work)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mri, ct scan)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans much cost)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mri, scan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ultrasound, scans work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(mri, scan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)