mri: scan for prostate cancer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
scan for prostate cancer 1.00
be done for breast cancer 0.85
be for brain tumor 0.84
scans work 0.82
scan 0.82
scan work 0.81
scans much cost 0.79
be for imaging tissue 0.79
be for imaging soft tissue 0.78
be better than ultrasound 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(brain, scans work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brain, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ultrasound, scans work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, scans work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mri, be for brain tumor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mri, be done for breast cancer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mri, scan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mri, scans work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mri, scan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mri, scan work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mri, scans much cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mri, be for brain tumor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, be for brain tumor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, scan work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mri, scans work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mri, be done for breast cancer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mri, scans much cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mri, be for brain tumor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mri, scan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mri, be done for breast cancer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mri, scans work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mri, scan work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mri, be done for breast cancer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mri, scans much cost)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans much cost)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ultrasound, scans work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brain, scans work)