mri: be better than ultrasound

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than ultrasound 1.00
be instead of ultrasound 0.95
be for imaging tissue 0.79
be for imaging soft tissue 0.77
scan for prostate cancer 0.76
scans much cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mri, be instead of ultrasound)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(mri, be instead of ultrasound)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mri, be instead of ultrasound)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mri, be instead of ultrasound)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mri, scans much cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mri, scans much cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans much cost)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mri, scans much cost)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound)