mri: be for imaging tissue

Property	Similarity
be for imaging tissue	1.00
be for imaging soft tissue	0.97
be for tissue	0.89
be for soft tissue	0.84
scan for prostate cancer	0.79
be better than ultrasound	0.79
be instead of ultrasound	0.78
be for brain tumor	0.75

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(mri, be for tissue)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(mri, be for soft tissue)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(mri, be for tissue)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(mri, be for tissue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(mri, be for imaging soft tissue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(mri, be for soft tissue)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(mri, be instead of ultrasound)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(mri, be for soft tissue)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(mri, be instead of ultrasound)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(mri, be for brain tumor)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(mri, be for brain tumor)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(mri, be better than ultrasound)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mri, be instead of ultrasound)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(mri, be for brain tumor)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(mri, be better than ultrasound)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(mri, be better than ultrasound)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(mri, be better than ultrasound)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(mri, be for brain tumor)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(mri, be for tissue)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mri, be instead of ultrasound)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(mri, be for soft tissue)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(mri, be for imaging tissue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(mri, scan for prostate cancer)

Parents	method Weight: 0.65 , modality Weight: 0.60 , tool Weight: 0.60 , brain Weight: 0.59 , technology Weight: 0.58
Siblings	mri machine Weight: 0.35 , ultrasound Weight: 0.34 , cerebral palsy Weight: 0.33 , gamma radiation Weight: 0.33 , surgical procedure Weight: 0.32

mri: be for imaging tissue

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible