mrt: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public transport
Weight: 0.47
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.37
, project
Weight: 0.36
, thing
Weight: 0.36
, service
Weight: 0.33
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.26
, air travel
Weight: 0.26
, tram
Weight: 0.25
, trolley
Weight: 0.25
, underground
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mrt, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(public transport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mrt, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mrt, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(public transport, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(public transport, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mrt, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(public transport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mrt, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mrt, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(air travel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(air travel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mrt, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mrt, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(public transport, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air travel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(public transport, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mrt, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)