project: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	mission Weight: 0.65 , upgrade Weight: 0.64 , facility Weight: 0.63 , web site Weight: 0.61
Siblings	restoration Weight: 0.69 , expansion Weight: 0.69 , construction site Weight: 0.68 , landscaping Weight: 0.68 , construction worker Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is more expensive	0.94
is damn expensive	0.84
be cheaper on end	0.80
cost more	0.76
is attractive	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(upgrade, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(expansion, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(expansion, is expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(landscaping, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(construction worker, is attractive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(construction worker, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(project, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(project, be cheaper on end)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(construction worker, is attractive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(landscaping, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)