expansion: is damn expensive

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.69 , construction Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.59 , growth Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	construction site Weight: 0.35 , construction worker Weight: 0.34 , restoration Weight: 0.33 , revision Weight: 0.33 , consolidation Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is damn expensive	1.00
is expensive	0.84
is more expensive	0.82
is boring	0.79
be considered cheap	0.77
do nothing	0.76
is thing	0.75
be thing	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, do nothing)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(revision, is boring)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(revision, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(revision, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(revision, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(revision, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(revision, is more expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(construction worker, do nothing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(construction worker, do nothing)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(revision, is boring) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(revision, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(expansion, is damn expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(expansion, is expensive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(expansion, is expensive)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(construction worker, do nothing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(revision, is boring)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(revision, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)