construction: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.64 , activity Weight: 0.64 , program Weight: 0.61 , expansion Weight: 0.61
Siblings	office building Weight: 0.73 , excavation Weight: 0.63 , artificial turf Weight: 0.58 , completion Weight: 0.56 , beam Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is damn expensive	0.84
be cheaper on end	0.80
be considered cheap	0.78
be based costing better	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(expansion, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(expansion, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(beam, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(excavation, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(expansion, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(artificial turf, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(artificial turf, is expensive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(beam, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(beam, is expensive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(excavation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(excavation, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(construction, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(construction, be considered cheap)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(beam, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(excavation, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(artificial turf, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)