construction: be considered cheap

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.64 , activity Weight: 0.64 , program Weight: 0.61 , expansion Weight: 0.61
Siblings	office building Weight: 0.73 , excavation Weight: 0.63 , artificial turf Weight: 0.58 , completion Weight: 0.56 , beam Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered cheap	1.00
is expensive	0.78
be cheaper on end	0.77
is damn expensive	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(expansion, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(expansion, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is damn expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(expansion, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(beam, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(excavation, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(expansion, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expansion, is damn expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(construction, be considered cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(artificial turf, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(artificial turf, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(beam, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(beam, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(excavation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(excavation, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(construction, be considered cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(construction, is expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(construction, be considered cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(beam, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(excavation, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(artificial turf, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(construction, be considered cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(expansion, is damn expensive)