project: be cheaper on end

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper on end 1.00
is more expensive 0.82
is expensive 0.80
cost more 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(upgrade, cost more)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(upgrade, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(expansion, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(expansion, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(expansion, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(landscaping, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(project, be cheaper on end)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(project, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(expansion, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(landscaping, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)