landscaping: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.68 , service Weight: 0.62 , field Weight: 0.61 , business Weight: 0.60 , cost Weight: 0.60
Siblings	construction Weight: 0.35 , construction site Weight: 0.35 , roofing Weight: 0.35 , gardening Weight: 0.34 , construction worker Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(landscaping, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(roofing, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(construction, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(landscaping, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(construction, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(construction, is expensive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(roofing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(roofing, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(landscaping, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(landscaping, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(construction, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(roofing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(landscaping, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)