upgrade: cost more

Related concepts

Parents	change Weight: 0.61 , hardware Weight: 0.60 , benefit Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.58
Siblings	project Weight: 0.64 , exhaust Weight: 0.57 , bleacher Weight: 0.46 , extension Weight: 0.33 , maintenance Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
cost more	1.00
is more expensive	0.85
is expensive	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hardware, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardware, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(hardware, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(hardware, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(exhaust, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(extension, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hardware, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(upgrade, cost more)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardware, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(upgrade, cost more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(extension, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(extension, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(exhaust, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(exhaust, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(maintenance, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(maintenance, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(upgrade, cost more)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(upgrade, is expensive)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is expensive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(exhaust, is expensive)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(maintenance, is expensive)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(extension, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(upgrade, cost more) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)