hardware: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
have expensive 0.93
be more expensive than hardware 0.87
is cheaper 0.86
be more expensive in europe 0.83
be more expensive in uk 0.82
have ridiculously expensive 0.82
be more expensive in australia 0.79
cost much more in uk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(merchandise, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(engineering, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(engineering, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(merchandise, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(module, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(merchandise, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(merchandise, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(engineering, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(macintosh, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(macintosh, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(software, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hardware, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardware, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hardware, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(engineering, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(operating system, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(merchandise, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macintosh, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(engineering, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(operating system, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(merchandise, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)