module: is cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.61
, computer program
Weight: 0.59
, solution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.59
, multiplier
Weight: 0.53
, classifier
Weight: 0.51
, lua
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheaper 1.00
is more expensive 0.86
is expensive 0.85
have expensive 0.83
be more expensive than hardware 0.76
is quicker 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer program, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer program, is quicker)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(computer program, is quicker)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hardware, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer program, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(module, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hardware, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardware, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(software, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(module, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer program, is quicker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer program, is quicker)