software: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.70
, module
Weight: 0.67
, code
Weight: 0.65
Siblings browser
Weight: 0.75
, computer game
Weight: 0.75
, free software
Weight: 0.74
, freeware
Weight: 0.70
, source code
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
have expensive 0.97
is cheaper 0.85
have ridiculously expensive 0.83
be more expensive than hardware 0.81
is complicated 0.78
be expensive in most retailers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(software company, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(software company, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(module, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(software company, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(module, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer game, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(computer game, be expensive in most retailers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(software company, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(software, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(module, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(software, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer game, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer game, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(computer game, be expensive in most retailers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(computer game, be expensive in most retailers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(software, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(software, be more expensive than hardware)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(software, be more expensive than hardware)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(software, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer game, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer game, be expensive in most retailers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(software, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(module, is cheaper)