upgrade: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	change Weight: 0.61 , hardware Weight: 0.60 , benefit Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.58
Siblings	project Weight: 0.64 , exhaust Weight: 0.57 , bleacher Weight: 0.46 , extension Weight: 0.33 , maintenance Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is more expensive	0.94
cost more	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardware, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hardware, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(hardware, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(hardware, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(hardware, is more expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(hardware, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(exhaust, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(extension, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardware, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is expensive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hardware, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(extension, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(extension, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(exhaust, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(exhaust, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(maintenance, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(maintenance, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(upgrade, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(upgrade, cost more)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(upgrade, cost more)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(upgrade, cost more)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is more expensive)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, cost more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(upgrade, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(exhaust, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(maintenance, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(extension, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(hardware, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(upgrade, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(hardware, is more expensive)