revision: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.64
, modification
Weight: 0.62
, project
Weight: 0.62
, part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amendment
Weight: 0.69
, change
Weight: 0.61
, deletion
Weight: 0.54
, correction
Weight: 0.34
, abolition
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(part, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(part, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(part, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(part, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(revision, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(revision, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(revision, is expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(revision, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(revision, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(revision, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(part, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(part, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)