mug: have glass bottoms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, container
Weight: 0.53
, photo
Weight: 0.50
, glass
Weight: 0.49
Siblings coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, beer mug
Weight: 0.36
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.33
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.33
, cup
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have glass bottoms 1.00
has physical part bottoms 0.88
have concave bottoms 0.88
has physical part lids 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(beer mug, have glass bottoms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beer mug, has physical part lids)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(beer mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(beer mug, have glass bottoms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part lids)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beer mug, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beer mug, has physical part lids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mug, have glass bottoms)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mug, have concave bottoms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mug, has physical part bottoms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mug, has physical part lids)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mug, have concave bottoms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mug, have concave bottoms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mug, has physical part bottoms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mug, has physical part bottoms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mug, has physical part bottoms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mug, have concave bottoms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mug, has physical part lids)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mug, has physical part lids)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mug, has physical part lids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mug, have glass bottoms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(beer mug, have glass bottoms)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cup, have concave bottoms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(beer mug, has physical part lids)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mug, have glass bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part lids)