mule: be better than donkeys

Property	Similarity
be better than donkeys	1.00
be better than horses	0.85
be considered better than horses	0.83
be stronger than horses	0.81
be bigger than horses	0.81
be better than horses on steepy slopes	0.79
be better than horses on slopes	0.79

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(mule, be stronger than horses)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(mule, be stronger than horses)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(mule, be stronger than horses)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(mule, be stronger than horses)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(mule, be considered better than horses)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on slopes)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(mule, be bigger than horses)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(mule, be bigger than horses)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(mule, be bigger than horses)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(mule, be considered better than horses)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(mule, be considered better than horses)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on slopes)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(mule, be bigger than horses)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(mule, be considered better than horses)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on slopes)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses on slopes)

Parents	animal Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.50 , framework Weight: 0.48
Siblings	mare Weight: 0.50 , mountain goat Weight: 0.34 , donkey Weight: 0.34 , llama Weight: 0.34 , prairie dog Weight: 0.34

mule: be better than donkeys

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings