mule: be better than donkeys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, framework
Weight: 0.48
Siblings mare
Weight: 0.50
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.34
, donkey
Weight: 0.34
, llama
Weight: 0.34
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than donkeys 1.00
be better than horses 0.85
be considered better than horses 0.83
be stronger than horses 0.81
be bigger than horses 0.81
be better than horses on steepy slopes 0.79
be better than horses on slopes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be better than horses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(donkey, be better than horses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(donkey, be better than horses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses on slopes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(donkey, be better than horses)