mule: be better than horses on steepy slopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, framework
Weight: 0.48
Siblings mare
Weight: 0.50
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.34
, donkey
Weight: 0.34
, llama
Weight: 0.34
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than horses on steepy slopes 1.00
be better than horses on slopes 1.00
be better than horses 0.90
be considered better than horses 0.88
be bigger than horses 0.86
be stronger than horses 0.86
be better than donkeys 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be better than horses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(donkey, be better than horses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(donkey, be better than horses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than horses)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mule, be better than donkeys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mule, be better than horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on slopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mule, be better than donkeys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mule, be stronger than horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mule, be better than donkeys)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mule, be bigger than horses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mule, be considered better than horses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than donkeys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mule, be better than horses on steepy slopes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(donkey, be better than horses)