murder: affect family

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect family 1.00
was family 0.87
was knievels family 0.87
affect community 0.83
affect people 0.82
affect business 0.80
affect quality of life 0.80
affect on business 0.80
affect society 0.79
affect area 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(evil, affect community)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(crime, affect community)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(evil, affect family)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(crime, affect society)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crime, affect area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(evil, affect family)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(evil, was knievels family)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evil, was family)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, affect people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(evil, affect family)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(evil, was knievels family)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(evil, was family)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(evil, affect community)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(evil, affect family)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(murder, affect family)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(evil, affect community)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(murder, affect family)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(crime, affect community)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(murder, affect family)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(evil, was family)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(murder, affect family)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(evil, was knievels family)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(murder, affect family)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(murder, affect family)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(murder, affect society)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(murder, affect society)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(murder, affect society)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(murder, affect family)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crime, affect area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(evil, affect family)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(evil, was knievels family)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(evil, affect family)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(evil, was knievels family)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(murder, affect family)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crime, affect area)
...