murder: be in alabama

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in alabama 1.00
be in alabama difficult 0.94
be in utah 0.84
be high in florida 0.83
be in west virginia 0.80
go in philadelphia 0.80
be in west virginia hard 0.79
be high in baltimore 0.79
be high in alaska 0.78
be in chicago 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, be in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(felony, be in utah)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in alaska)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(felony, be in utah)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(homicide, be in chicago)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, be in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(murder, be in alabama)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(murder, be in alabama)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(homicide, be in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(homicide, be in chicago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(murder, be in alabama)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(murder, go in philadelphia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(murder, be in chicago)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(murder, go in philadelphia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(murder, be in chicago)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(murder, go in philadelphia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in chicago)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(murder, be in west virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in west virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(murder, be in west virginia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(murder, go in philadelphia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(murder, be in chicago)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(murder, be in west virginia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(murder, be in alabama difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(felony, be in utah)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(homicide, be in chicago)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(felony, be in utah)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(murder, be in alabama) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)