mush: has quality worth

Related concepts

Parents	label Weight: 0.44 , food Weight: 0.44 , meal Weight: 0.37 , anything Weight: 0.33 , word Weight: 0.31
Siblings	spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.30 , fried egg Weight: 0.30 , oatmeal Weight: 0.30 , meat pie Weight: 0.30 , apple sauce Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality worth	1.00
has quality good	0.85
is net worth	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(label, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(label, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(label, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(mush, has quality worth)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(label, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(mush, has quality worth)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(mush, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(mush, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(mush, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(mush, is net worth)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mush, is net worth)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(mush, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(mush, is net worth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(mush, is net worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(label, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(label, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mush, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)