mute swan: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	bird Weight: 0.73 , species Weight: 0.64 , swan Weight: 0.57 , wildlife Weight: 0.52
Siblings	black swan Weight: 0.40 , trumpeter swan Weight: 0.38 , heron Weight: 0.38 , peregrine falcon Weight: 0.38 , owl Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality evil	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(owl, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(owl, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(owl, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality evil)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(species, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(owl, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(mute swan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(species, has quality good)