na: be considered weakest of major regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rapper
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.53
, element
Weight: 0.51
, act
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ra
Weight: 0.33
, nas
Weight: 0.33
, paul simon
Weight: 0.32
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.32
, leo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered weakest of major regions 1.00
be considered major region 0.86
be weak as region 0.82
be bad compared to other regions 0.82
is weak region 0.81
be bad compared to regions 0.81
be considered region 0.80
be trash compared to other regions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(na, be weak as region)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(na, be considered major region)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(na, be trash compared to other regions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(na, be weak as region)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(na, be trash compared to other regions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(na, be considered major region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(na, be weak as region)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(na, be considered major region)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(na, be trash compared to other regions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(na, be considered major region)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(na, be weak as region)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(na, be trash compared to other regions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions)