nail polish: be bad for how

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stain
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, paint
Weight: 0.64
, hand
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glitter
Weight: 0.61
, nail
Weight: 0.37
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for how 1.00
go bad 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality bad 0.78
be bad for brain 0.76
is hard 0.75
be bad for dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hand, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(stain, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(stain, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hand, is hard)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hand, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stain, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(glitter, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nail, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hand, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(stain, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(glitter, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(glitter, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(glitter, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(glitter, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nail, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(nail, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for how)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(nail polish, go bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(nail polish, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for brain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for brain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for brain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nail polish, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for brain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nail polish, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(nail polish, is hard)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(nail polish, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stain, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hand, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(glitter, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(glitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(glitter, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nail, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stain, is hard)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hand, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nail polish, be bad for how) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)