nail polish: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stain
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, paint
Weight: 0.64
, hand
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glitter
Weight: 0.61
, nail
Weight: 0.37
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
be bad for how 0.82
has quality bad 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad for dogs 0.77
feel weird 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(glitter, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(glitter, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(nail polish, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for how)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nail polish, feel weird)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, feel weird)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nail polish, feel weird)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(nail polish, feel weird)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nail polish, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(glitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(glitter, be bad for environment)