name: be in red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.69
, nickname
Weight: 0.68
, identifier
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.85
, alias
Weight: 0.65
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.63
, username
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in red 1.00
be in red on imessage 0.98
be red on imessage 0.98
use colour red 0.93
has color yellow 0.86
has color pink 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(description, has color yellow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(description, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(description, has color yellow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(domain name, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(domain name, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(name, be in red)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(name, be red on imessage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(name, be red on imessage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(name, be red on imessage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(name, be red on imessage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(name, has color pink)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(name, has color pink)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(name, has color pink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(name, be in red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(domain name, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(description, has color yellow)