name: has color pink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.69
, nickname
Weight: 0.68
, identifier
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.85
, alias
Weight: 0.65
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.63
, username
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color pink 1.00
has color yellow 0.92
be in red 0.82
be red on imessage 0.80
be in red on imessage 0.80
use colour red 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(description, has color yellow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(description, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(description, has color yellow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(domain name, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(domain name, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(name, has color pink)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(name, be in red)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(name, be red on imessage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(name, be in red)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(name, be in red)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(name, be red on imessage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(name, be red on imessage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(name, be in red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(name, be red on imessage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(name, has color pink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(domain name, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(description, has color yellow)