nanotechnology: be useful in field

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.34
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in field 1.00
be useful in field of medicine 0.89
is useful 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(optics, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(optics, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(optics, is useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(semiconductor, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(optics, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is useful)