nanotechnology: be useful in field of medicine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.34
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in field of medicine 1.00
be important in medicine 0.91
be useful in field 0.89
is useful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(optics, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(optics, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(optics, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(semiconductor, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(optics, is useful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is useful)