nanotechnology: is is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.34
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is developed 1.00
is is developed rapidly 0.87
was created 0.79
was invented 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fiber optics, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed rapidly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed rapidly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed rapidly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was invented)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed rapidly)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, was created)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was invented)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fiber optics, was invented)